20 thoughts on “Emails from a cult leader”

1. Yes, I lifted that exchange out of the fruity *facts* site and 6,000 words or so of incoherent bullshit it was mired in. Among the accusations was a bit of hilarity questioning why Jane Hansen was questioning Sergio:

   Indeed if Jane Hansen had undertaken appropriate investigation she would have found that the Serge Benhayon was not the person to contact about the College – he is not even a director.

   Not any more. He’s the College’s founder though, and as News Ltd reported in September 2012 had anointed himself Chairman in perpetuity so no one can ‘bastardise the work’. Seems he had a quick change of heart under media scrutiny…

   The Esoteric goon squad would like to ban complainants from showing evidence to journalists and politicians – as if it’s some sort of crime. They haven’t noticed how democracy works, yet, but clearly that’s not their interest. The UniMed cult refuses any kind of public dialogue or negotiation unless it’s on their terms, and seeks to intimidate and silence anyone who diverges from their message. Hello fascism.

   The real comedy is that *facts* team propagandist, Alison Greig, reckons she used to lecture in trade practices law, prior to her distinguished career as a Weight Watchers counsellor.

   So Alison, show us where in the Australian Crimes Act showing complaints/evidence of misconduct to interested parties is regarded as unlawful.

   Your time might be better spent looking at charity law.

2. I guess when Serge claimed “he would love to debate anyone on the planet” he really meant he isn’t willing to answer any questions that may be put to him, especially if the person asking the questions has also interviewed his critics and feels that there may be quite valid reasons for people to be criticizing him.

   Come on, Serge. You’re the World Teacher who knows all the mysteries of the Universe. Surely you can do better than this?

3. For someone who feels that some perfectly normal questions that can be answered in 10 minutes are INTRUSIVE, Sergio surely took an awful lot of time and effort to waffle on about journalistic integrity and avoid answering any of those questions.

   Interesting though to see how he writes when he doesn’t spout his esoteric bullshit. “utmost” seems to be one of his favourite words. And manipulation through twisting of facts and circular arguments peppered with some esoteric non-sense seems to have become his (only) way communicating with people. Kudos, Jane, for not backing down. That is what I call UTMOST journalistic integrity.

   1. Precisely. He could have answered the questions in less time, and more succinctly than the first garbled, barely comprehensible barrage of issue avoidance he sent Jane in his initial response. This is a man who constantly claims he “will never back down from what he knows to be true.” Unless someone not involved in the cult questions him, it would seem.

4. On the contrary Serge, it is pure conviction. Conviction that we know and are speaking the truth. Conviction that the lies are not from our side. “A lie is a lie, no matter how you ‘dress’ it” That is for sure. And they go way back.

   We’ve only asked questions, which like with Jane, you continually fail to answer. As do your minions, and your members. To quote you, that smells “fishy”.

   As Esther says, we’re not under investigation. You may have conflated a good story to convince yourself and each other about me and Esther on your hate-blogs, but they are not factual. Facts require evidence. A few ugly shots and a concocted story based on poor assumptions don’t make for investigations. Do they?

   And to the members. Surely you can’t read those incoherent hate-sprays from Serge and not know he’s not firing on all cylinders? What enlightened master- an exponent of cosmic love- is so hateful and vindictive based on what he assumes is going to be said?

   It’s one man’s worldview being protected at all cost.

   There’s is a lot of truth in Serge’s words; but not how he means them. Read them closely for as usual the author reveals himself.

   And Alison- take a break love. No one believes you, except perhaps other members. ( I say perhaps because I’d like to believe a few of them have a few brain cells remaining) Like Serge, you reveal more about yourself and your faulty perceptions than the people you think you are exposing.

   Look people, when you’ve got lots of pieces of paper that tell you things are not even remotely the same as has been claimed, and scores of people who have told you tales of woe about the man you base your lives on, it’s farcical to be called a liar. It really is. I can assure you, we walk tall. If anything, when I glimpse your mugs around the place, I feel pity for you. Truly.

   We know you choose not to believe it, for whatever reason. But truth eventually finds its way to the surface. Sometimes even when it matters. Revenge, no. Conviction- yes.

   And a conviction based on reality. Not “one-unified-truth”. Think about it.

5. At least, I know now the man actually exist. Amazing, what 6,000 words (or so) can do for a person.

   For two years I felt like watching The Usual Suspects, with the mythical Keyser Soze, or something weird like that ….

   Awesome, exposing article!

   1. Yes it is revealing, and a change from the days when all the UM sites would post was carefully edited sweetness and light, while the puppet master hid behind his Brides.

      Two remarkable things: we in the bunker are truly impressed by the level of delusion – where they think their fucked up facts site with it’s comprehensive bullshit and defamation was a good idea AND they posted that exchange between Sergio and Jane Hansen. We are constantly asking each other, do they really think that makes them look good?

      Next, who dreams up the excuses? I predicted before the article was published they’d react the way they had to previous coverage – squealing media bias, all the trouble is down to a few disgruntled individuals and the media is missing the ‘real story’. So is Serge following the line of his propaganda team, or are they following him, or is it a group effort? Helped by some teleconferencing software? And the big question – do they really believe any of it?

      Also, Serge has said he’s come up smelling of roses every time there’s been an investigation – but apart from the UKCC action, let’s not forget the TGA made him clean up the marketing of the Eso Herbs.

      And what reason did OAMPS give the Esoteric Practitioners Association for withdrawing their professional indemnity insurance?

      Hm?

      Something to do with failing their duty of disclosure wasn’t it?

      1. – ” utter filth and vitriLOL says:July 7, 2014 at 6:18 pm Yes it is revealing, and a change from the days when all the UM sites would post was carefully edited sweetness and light, while the puppet master hid behind his Brides.

         Two remarkable things: we in the bunker are truly impressed by the level of delusion – where they think their fucked up facts site with it’s comprehensive bullshit and defamation was a good idea AND they posted that exchange between Sergio and Jane Hansen. We are constantly asking each other, do they really think that makes them look good? ” –

         I even started to doubt my own mind and stopped drinking alcohol, immediately.

         Serge, feels intruded by the deadline of a journalist, which is basically the same as saying you feel intruded by a barrister because he has to work within the law, – while her questions are a lot more intrusive then her deadline is; visibly becomes passive aggressive about it: and even comes up with his own manufactured press-kit on top of that…?!

         Students in the comments can’t stop admiring his love and ‘utmost’ integrity…

         Only a full blown narcissist can come up with this. In this respect: yeah, integrity it is.

6. They really can’t put two and two together can they? And they probably still think I am you?

   I am fascinated to know what this true charity “in its delivery’ is that will amaze the socks off everyone, which according to Alison, people will be studying in years to come… I am sure they will. But not for the reasons they’re imagining.

   There really is a co-joining of Serge and his retinue of tuneless trumpeters isn’t there? If Serge is criticized, they are. If Serge has an angry outburst, they feel justified. If Serge is found out, they run to his protection. If a journalist dare ask a question, they are as outraged as he is. So much so, they contradict themselves in their analysis, mirroring Serge’s contradictory ramble about the specifics of his meaning on how he says he was intruded upon. Fascinating. And immensely stupid stuff.

   What is really stupid though is how Serge thinks putting these emails up proves his is right. The reality is, they do way more damage than what he thinks the critics have done. Amazing. And immensely stupid stuff.

7. The email trail between Serge Benhanyon and Jane Hansen is so illustrative of any conversation with a member of Universal Medicine. A few simple questions are asked, and the reply is paragraph after paragraph of essentially nonsense. Nothing is said by Benhaynon of any consequence, no answers are given, and every attempt is made to confuse and muddy the issue. Behnanyon and his supporters are digging themselves in to a huge hole by publishing this material, and a quick look on Twitter and the reposting of this conversation by many people with large followings show what a massive own goal this is.

   Please do keep posting material like this and your other malicious posts, Ms Greig on your blog. There could be no better reinforcement of the true nature of Universal Medicine and those involved with it than the bile you are spewing forth.

8. OMG A JOURNALIST FOLLOWED YOUR TWITTER ACCOUNT

   CALL THE ESOTERIC THOUGHT POLICE!

   CALL THE FIERY FIRING SQUAD!

   poor little Sergio is feeling hurt

9. You have to love the audacity with which Serge claims to present nothing more than self-loving choices and the media seeks to sensationalize what is at the core of UM. Firstly, Serge has published seven books of absolutely ludicrous, near-plagiarized, Theosophical gibberish featuring outrageous supernatural claims too numerous to mention here, so it’s not really just about self-loving choices, is it Serge? So the person responsible for the sensationalism is you, isn’t it Serge? You just can’t handle being called on it, despite your claims to be willing to debate anyone on the planet as to the veracity of your statements.

10. “Finally, I will give you a small glimpse of what will be found — with regard to the Charity and it being on my land and my building: there is no untoward personal gain whatsoever for me. In fact, there is personal loss for the sake of true Charity”

    In October 2012, one month after Josh Robertson’s article, Serge resigned as the director and installed Charles Wilson, Natalie Benhayon and Desiree Delaloye as directors. Serryn O’Regan became Chairman. Despite his ramblings, he’s smart enough to know that being the director of the charity, and owning the land where the primary object of fundraising is located, looks a little…suss.

    The charity then recently transformed into a “student initiative” according to Charles Wilson on ABC radio. Despite us having notes going back where Serge is spruiking the charity, and working with Vic Lister to set it up “according to Lord Maitreya’s plan (not Serge, Lord Maitreya!!) and doing his usual “it’s not about me” number on the members.

    Then there was a bit of a brain-storming session where the penny dropped that Serge has, in-truth, been doing “philanthropic” work for years. You know, when he has kids come and stay at his house and do “work experience” at the clinic. Presumably for free. Donor of the year award, right there.

    Or maybe they thought letting people stay at the house across the road here and there for “free” was charity? Or the no-interest loans on so people could to his courses…and pay him later?

    Hmmm.

    There’s probably a pop up office for the charity being thrown together right now just to make it look like its not a part of UM proper. Maybe in a corner room or at someone’s house…

    The agreed story then goes: Serge is “donating” the land for the charity. Now, he is not quite ready to hand over the deeds, but he’s paying the interest (on the part he had to pay for that wasn’t covered by anon donations) and he had to do some D.A work…When the building is done, then the charity can purchase it off him for cost price, plus out of pockets. Or say they’ll say. Philanthropic work on a level never heard of before!

    Bemusingly, none of them will think that there is anything amiss, because they all SEE the grand plan. Us astrally impulsed prana-sacks just can’t perceive the brilliance and true-ness of it all.

    I’d like to dissect the bucket loads of false dilemmas, flawed arguments and hints of grandiosity in his ramblings. But I can’t be bothered. Needless to say, it sucks. But at least he’s put himself out there for once. It’s the first time we’ve heard his voice since the start of the new-era (or before)

    And now we’ve heard it, we know why he shuts up.

    “True” charity. Right.

11. Righto trolls and abusers, I’ve put the ASIC Change of Company details document up in the cloud showing the dates Sergio resigned from the College board, and installed his faith-full stooges.
    https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=EEBAACEA73CD7E87!166&authkey=!AGnlSrfz6ynGK1A&ithint=file%2c.pdf

    (Viewing and posting public documents online is what the cult calls cyberstalking® and cyber-bullying®, by the way…)

    Does anyone know what the TRA abbreviation means?

    His holiness who has nothing to hide and nothing to gain from the charity ditched his directorship pretty quickly when the questions started.

    Lets see how the fraudulent *facts* site tries to paper over that bit of integrity.

    And a reminder to Sergio’s wowser army, comments are always open here – to all comers. Bring your ‘love’ and ‘truth’ and let’s make it an open discussion.

    1. Check out that ASIC document!

       1. Correction on above.

          Serge was interviewed by Josh Robinson 6th September 2012.
          The change of directors was accepted by ASIC on the 7th September 2012.
          The courier mail story came out the 8th September 2012.

          Coincidence what?

          1. From the website of the new College Chairman, who happens to be a lawyer:

             All of Serryn O’Regan’s work is inspired by and because of the work of Serge Benhayon and Universal Medicine

             Looks like on September 6, 2012 that equation reversed and Sergio chucked his One Unified bollocks and listened to his lawyer.

             Too late, though.

    2. I think TRA stands for Tanzania Revenue Authority?

12. If Mr Benhayon made the time to write the above epistle – why did he refuse to meet with Ms Hansen?
    It wasn’t to do with SB being so busy was it? Ms Hansen requests were kindly and professional.

    Maybe Ms Hansen is grateful that Mr Benhayon refused her kindly requests. The above ‘holy writing’ is frustrating enough to read and doesn’t make sense, imagine dealing with that in person. OMG! It was so predictable that Ms Hansen would receive that kind of reception from UM.

    From the above ‘Holy writings’ this is what struck me:
    “Finally, I will give you a small glimpse of what will be found — with regard to the Charity and it being on my land and my building: there is no untoward personal gain whatsoever for me. In fact, there is personal loss for the sake of true Charity”

    “No UNTOWARD personal gain??” Means what? You either have personal gain or you don’t.

    AND yes we remember this:”He’s the College’s founder though, and as News Ltd reported in September 2012 had anointed himself Chairman in perpetuity so no one can ‘bastardise the work’.”

13. http://documentarystorm.com/the-most-hated-family-in-america/

    With Love,
    The Lord of Form

Comments are closed.